Comments on: Two types of visibility http://prconnections.net/two-types-of-visibility/ Dr. Mihaela Vorvoreanu Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:33:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mihaela http://prconnections.net/two-types-of-visibility/comment-page-1/#comment-669 Mihaela Fri, 29 May 2009 21:12:46 +0000 http://prconnections.net/?p=248#comment-669 Hmmm, it seems I just found a new person who could guest lecture on SEO :) Would you be interested, if/when the time comes? Hmmm, it seems I just found a new person who could guest lecture on SEO :) Would you be interested, if/when the time comes?

]]> By: Jon Payne http://prconnections.net/two-types-of-visibility/comment-page-1/#comment-666 Jon Payne Thu, 28 May 2009 18:23:05 +0000 http://prconnections.net/?p=248#comment-666 Sure thing. Just please teach all of your students that when they write a press release and put the URL towards the end in the company bio section, to please format it as http://www.website.com not www.website.com. The former will become a clickable hyperlink on most sites that pick up (syndicate verbatim) the release, whereas the latter will not do this as often. This simple detail means more links to your site from the press release, and thus will help your SEO efforts! Sure thing. Just please teach all of your students that when they write a press release and put the URL towards the end in the company bio section, to please format it as http://www.website.com not http://www.website.com. The former will become a clickable hyperlink on most sites that pick up (syndicate verbatim) the release, whereas the latter will not do this as often.

This simple detail means more links to your site from the press release, and thus will help your SEO efforts!

]]> By: Mihaela http://prconnections.net/two-types-of-visibility/comment-page-1/#comment-665 Mihaela Thu, 28 May 2009 17:54:43 +0000 http://prconnections.net/?p=248#comment-665 This makes a lot of sense, Jon. Thank you for putting the two together! As to the ranking of Pillar... well, the keyword is "should" :) This makes a lot of sense, Jon. Thank you for putting the two together!

As to the ranking of Pillar… well, the keyword is “should” :)

]]> By: Jon Payne http://prconnections.net/two-types-of-visibility/comment-page-1/#comment-664 Jon Payne Thu, 28 May 2009 17:49:58 +0000 http://prconnections.net/?p=248#comment-664 Dr V - I like the push v. pull discussion here. Running an SEO agency, just about everything we do is the pull... its search. That said, a major factor in ranking well in search engines is getting inbound links to your site so Google knows you are credible. That means people need to 1) know you exist and 2) value your offering or approach - and they need to do so independent of search engines... since you aren't ranking just yet. Thus, we find ourselves implementing "pull" campaigns such as blogger outreach and press release distribution to hopefully reach the right channels and give them a reason to link to our site... so we can rank well... so we can get the pull traffic. BTW - Pillar doesn't seem to be ranking anywhere for the keyword phrase you mentioned! Dr V – I like the push v. pull discussion here. Running an SEO agency, just about everything we do is the pull… its search.

That said, a major factor in ranking well in search engines is getting inbound links to your site so Google knows you are credible. That means people need to 1) know you exist and 2) value your offering or approach – and they need to do so independent of search engines… since you aren’t ranking just yet. Thus, we find ourselves implementing “pull” campaigns such as blogger outreach and press release distribution to hopefully reach the right channels and give them a reason to link to our site… so we can rank well… so we can get the pull traffic.

BTW – Pillar doesn’t seem to be ranking anywhere for the keyword phrase you mentioned!

]]>